After a clinical performance at Cardiff, such a dismal
show from England was quite unexpected. They gained the momentum in Cardiff,
but failed to hold on to it as they were outplayed and outsmarted by a
professional Australian unit. The English simply failed to put up a fight
against the Aussies and their meek
surrender was not an easy one to digest for their supporters.
It was a ruthless Australia! Brilliant Australia!
Professional Australia! Yes, the Australians have bounced back at Lord’s in a
clinical fashion. They were down and out in Cardiff, and it didn’t dent Australia’s confidence, but in turn,
that defeat made them determined enough to dish out such a riveting display. On
a sun-kissed day at Lord’s, England’s miseries knew no bound.
What makes these Aussies to fight in such a ruthless and
professional manner? In my opinion, the enriched and professional cricket culture
of Australia aids them not only to play like a champion, but create champions
as well. Yes, lean -patches do visit
their cricket, but those dark phases are transient and ebb away fast due to a
professional cricketing infrastructure. Their cricket players and hierarchy are
well-equipped in knowing where the mistakes are being made and then., quickly
rectify them. Above all, temperamentally, each Australian is a champion.
For the past few days, I have read various opinions where some were repeatedly saying that the Lord’s track was a placid. If it was that flat then why the English batsmen failed to capitalize on it? Yes, the track didn’t have enough spice on it like Cardiff, but it was certainly not as dead as Ahmedabad, Lahore or Khulna. The track was almost like Adelaide where you can fetch good results if you land the cherry on the right line-and length and if the batsmen know the value of uplifting and slowing down the tempo according to the demand of the situation then you can reap a rich harvest here. Australia applied it, whereas England failed to to do the same.
For the past few days, I have read various opinions where some were repeatedly saying that the Lord’s track was a placid. If it was that flat then why the English batsmen failed to capitalize on it? Yes, the track didn’t have enough spice on it like Cardiff, but it was certainly not as dead as Ahmedabad, Lahore or Khulna. The track was almost like Adelaide where you can fetch good results if you land the cherry on the right line-and length and if the batsmen know the value of uplifting and slowing down the tempo according to the demand of the situation then you can reap a rich harvest here. Australia applied it, whereas England failed to to do the same.
Mitchell Marsh has proved his worth in Lord’s and it seems that Shane Watson’s Test career will be laid to rest.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment