How was the track at Kotla when Viv Richards announced his
arrival at the international arena with that epic 192 not out against an attack
comprising of Bishan Bedi, Prasanna and Venkataraghavan in 1974-75? How was the track when Suni Gavaskar scored
that epic 96 against Pakistan in Bengaluru in 1987? How was the track at Mumbai when Kevin
Pietersen and Alastair Cook scored those epic hundreds against the Indian
spinners?
I guess those tracks were rank-turners and they were as
similar as Nagpur. Or, they were more dangerous than Nagpur, I guess. Why were Viv, Sunny, Pietersen and Cook so
successful on such minefields? Viv and Pietersen mixed resolve and aggression
brilliantly while Sunny and Cook exhibited the perfect example of how to occupy
the crease relying on copybook technique.
Occupation at the crease and copybook technique will never be understood by those players and fans who are the fans of a meaningless format like Twenty20 and those of who are criticizing the Nagpur track should also sit down and watch how the South Africans batsmen batted!
The Nagpur track was a dust-bowl from day one and it seemed that cricket was played on it for days and the second day it was expected to be a testing one, but still, for a champion team like South Africa, boasting with Hashim Amla, Faf Du Plessis and AB de Villiers, was it that dangerous or poor a track to be skittled out for just 79 runs? I don’t think so. The track was substandard, but how good were the Proteas batsmen? JP Dumminy showed how to
Why are the critics not
blaming the technique?
At the moment, India are all set to break South Africa’s unbeaten record in
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment